<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A turnover crisis? Some historical perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celticshub.com/2009/03/16/a-turnover-crisis-some-historical-perspective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/03/16/a-turnover-crisis-some-historical-perspective/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:22:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Today&#8217;s Links 3/17 at New England Sports 24/7</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/03/16/a-turnover-crisis-some-historical-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Today&#8217;s Links 3/17 at New England Sports 24/7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=839#comment-399</guid>
		<description>[...] March went mad:  interview with Seth Davis  RSO  KG&#8217;s new Gatorade commercial  CelticsHub A turnover crisis? Some historical perspective Celts turn over worst performance of the year  SportsNetwork  Bulls welcome Celtics to the second [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] March went mad:  interview with Seth Davis  RSO  KG&#8217;s new Gatorade commercial  CelticsHub A turnover crisis? Some historical perspective Celts turn over worst performance of the year  SportsNetwork  Bulls welcome Celtics to the second [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Lowe</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/03/16/a-turnover-crisis-some-historical-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=839#comment-404</guid>
		<description>@ Mike--I guessed it was team turnovers being left out at one site, but I didn&#039;t want to get too bogged down in the numbers. And yes, the 15 TO boundary is too kind to the C&#039;s. I tried it with 15.5 and they still make the list. I didn&#039;t try it at 16 for some reason--maybe an inability to stomach the results? Or admit that the C&#039;s may crack the 16 mark before all 82 are done? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mike&#8211;I guessed it was team turnovers being left out at one site, but I didn&#039;t want to get too bogged down in the numbers. And yes, the 15 TO boundary is too kind to the C&#039;s. I tried it with 15.5 and they still make the list. I didn&#039;t try it at 16 for some reason&#8211;maybe an inability to stomach the results? Or admit that the C&#039;s may crack the 16 mark before all 82 are done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Curry</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/03/16/a-turnover-crisis-some-historical-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Curry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=839#comment-398</guid>
		<description>It appears that the Yahoo! team stats just total up the individual player stats.  And thanks to the existence of team turnovers, and the fact that the player per game stats are rounded, that number is unlikely to be accurate. 
 
NBA.com has the Celts at 15.95 TOs per game.  I&#039;m pretty sure that&#039;s more accurate. 
 
With that in mind, it would seem that by limiting your list to teams with only 15 turnovers, you are giving this year&#039;s Celtics team too much leeway.  A turnover a game is significant, and if your run your search with 1307 turnovers or more (the pace the Celtics are actually on), you find that there is not one Championship team in that list. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that the Yahoo! team stats just total up the individual player stats.  And thanks to the existence of team turnovers, and the fact that the player per game stats are rounded, that number is unlikely to be accurate.</p>
<p>NBA.com has the Celts at 15.95 TOs per game.  I&#039;m pretty sure that&#039;s more accurate.</p>
<p>With that in mind, it would seem that by limiting your list to teams with only 15 turnovers, you are giving this year&#039;s Celtics team too much leeway.  A turnover a game is significant, and if your run your search with 1307 turnovers or more (the pace the Celtics are actually on), you find that there is not one Championship team in that list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NBA News, Rumors, and Player Updates &#124; Empty the Bench</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/03/16/a-turnover-crisis-some-historical-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>NBA News, Rumors, and Player Updates &#124; Empty the Bench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=839#comment-392</guid>
		<description>[...] basketball player too. - 3 Shades of Blue - The Grizzlies can&#8217;t beat bad teams at home. - Celtics Hub - Turnovers are proving to be Boston&#8217;s Achilles heel. - Truth About It - Caron Butler: too [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] basketball player too. &#8211; 3 Shades of Blue &#8211; The Grizzlies can&#8217;t beat bad teams at home. &#8211; Celtics Hub &#8211; Turnovers are proving to be Boston&#8217;s Achilles heel. &#8211; Truth About It &#8211; Caron Butler: too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/03/16/a-turnover-crisis-some-historical-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=839#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Terrific article. I was really interested to see who the former Championship teams where with this type of turnovers problems -- guessed San An and Detroit but missed a bunch of the other contenders. 
 
The turnovers are definitely a weakness for Boston, but I don&#039;t it&#039;s a fatal flaw. It&#039;ll only become that if other things go wrong -- like say, another Ray Allen scoring drought in the playoffs. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific article. I was really interested to see who the former Championship teams where with this type of turnovers problems &#8212; guessed San An and Detroit but missed a bunch of the other contenders.</p>
<p>The turnovers are definitely a weakness for Boston, but I don&#039;t it&#039;s a fatal flaw. It&#039;ll only become that if other things go wrong &#8212; like say, another Ray Allen scoring drought in the playoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

