<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The C&#8217;s Offense: Better Without Garnett? (It Can&#8217;t Be&#8230;)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celticshub.com/2009/06/08/the-celtics-offense-better-without-garnett-it-cant-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/06/08/the-celtics-offense-better-without-garnett-it-cant-be/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:35:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: It Took 24 Games, But&#8230; &#187; Boston Celtics Basketball &#8211; Celtics news, rumors and analysis &#8211; CelticsHub.com</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/06/08/the-celtics-offense-better-without-garnett-it-cant-be/comment-page-1/#comment-16641</link>
		<dc:creator>It Took 24 Games, But&#8230; &#187; Boston Celtics Basketball &#8211; Celtics news, rumors and analysis &#8211; CelticsHub.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2396#comment-16641</guid>
		<description>[...] a while I was beginning to get worried. Last season, the Celtics offense played remarkably well in the 22 games KG missed due to his knee injury. The C&#8217;s scored more than 114 points per 100 possessions in those games, up from about 110 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a while I was beginning to get worried. Last season, the Celtics offense played remarkably well in the 22 games KG missed due to his knee injury. The C&#8217;s scored more than 114 points per 100 possessions in those games, up from about 110 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Reminder of KG&#8217;s Awesomeness &#187; Boston Celtics Basketball &#8211; Celtics news, rumors and analysis &#8211; CelticsHub.com</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/06/08/the-celtics-offense-better-without-garnett-it-cant-be/comment-page-1/#comment-9107</link>
		<dc:creator>A Reminder of KG&#8217;s Awesomeness &#187; Boston Celtics Basketball &#8211; Celtics news, rumors and analysis &#8211; CelticsHub.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2396#comment-9107</guid>
		<description>[...] I got some flak for pointing out that the Celtics offense performed better, at least statistically, in 22 regular season games without KG, even though I argued that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I got some flak for pointing out that the Celtics offense performed better, at least statistically, in 22 regular season games without KG, even though I argued that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomc</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/06/08/the-celtics-offense-better-without-garnett-it-cant-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>tomc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2396#comment-3619</guid>
		<description>Convincing explanation?  Ousted in second round!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Convincing explanation?  Ousted in second round!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Lowe</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/06/08/the-celtics-offense-better-without-garnett-it-cant-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3588</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2396#comment-3588</guid>
		<description>@Dave: I hope it&#039;s clear from the post that I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave: I hope it&#8217;s clear from the post that I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/06/08/the-celtics-offense-better-without-garnett-it-cant-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3587</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2396#comment-3587</guid>
		<description>Nah, I think this is an example of the stats lying.

The team&#039;s offense would have been much better against elite defensive squads like Orlando with Kevin Garnett in the lineup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, I think this is an example of the stats lying.</p>
<p>The team&#8217;s offense would have been much better against elite defensive squads like Orlando with Kevin Garnett in the lineup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Better Without KG... - MyPostingSpace.com</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/06/08/the-celtics-offense-better-without-garnett-it-cant-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3580</link>
		<dc:creator>Better Without KG... - MyPostingSpace.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2396#comment-3580</guid>
		<description>[...] Not Ranked&#160; :&#160; +0 / -0&#160; 0&#160;score&#160; &#160;&#160;&#160;   Better Without KG...      Ha ha, I know some people who are going to love this but even McHale himself said it. The Boston Celtics are better without Kevin Garnett.  Like I always said, KG is overrated.  You want a link with stats? Certainly.  The C&#8217;s Offense: Better Without Garnett? (It Can&#8217;t Be&#8230;) &#124; Celtics Hub [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not Ranked&nbsp; :&nbsp; +0 / -0&nbsp; 0&nbsp;score&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;   Better Without KG&#8230;      Ha ha, I know some people who are going to love this but even McHale himself said it. The Boston Celtics are better without Kevin Garnett.  Like I always said, KG is overrated.  You want a link with stats? Certainly.  The C&#8217;s Offense: Better Without Garnett? (It Can&#8217;t Be&#8230;) | Celtics Hub [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyrus 2000</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/06/08/the-celtics-offense-better-without-garnett-it-cant-be/comment-page-1/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyrus 2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2396#comment-3579</guid>
		<description>Fine. The Celtics are better offensively without KG. Did you watch the Boston/Orlando game at all? Defensively...well, KG was the Defensive Player of the Year. Unless the C&#039;s are planning on acquiring Tim Duncan, I&#039;d call it a fat chance that they&#039;d get anywhere near the defensive value on Garnett in moving him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine. The Celtics are better offensively without KG. Did you watch the Boston/Orlando game at all? Defensively&#8230;well, KG was the Defensive Player of the Year. Unless the C&#8217;s are planning on acquiring Tim Duncan, I&#8217;d call it a fat chance that they&#8217;d get anywhere near the defensive value on Garnett in moving him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
