Comments on: What will the Celtics do with House money?

By: love-JB

love-JB — Sun, 08 May 2011 17:56:41 +0000

good

By: tom

tom — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:34:43 +0000

lakers=another 3peat celtics next champsionship=2057?maybe

By: m. a.

m. a. — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:30:52 +0000

IT WILL BE A BIG MISTAKE TO LET EDDIE HOUSE GO, WE LOST POSE LAST YEAR . HE COULD HAVE BEEN A BIG HELP AS A BACK UP FOR PIERCE THIS YEAR. WITH ALL THE RUMORS ABOUT RAY ALLEN MIGHT BE TRADED. EDDIE HOUSE WOULD THE THE BEST 3 POINT SHOOTER IN THE TEAM. WE REALLY NEED HIS SCORING COMING OFF THE BENCH. WE MAY NOT HAVE GLEN DAVIS BACK. IF THE C'S ARE SMART THEY SHOULD KEEP EDDIE & DAVIS, AND SIGN A BIG MAN AS A BACK UP FOR PERK.

By: Bobby

Bobby — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:26:10 +0000

The Celtics just need to get healthy. =We watched them all year and they damn near limped into the Finals with the reserves and starters pulling hard to get it done. As beatup as they were, they were the team that should have been in the finals!

By: bOBBY

bOBBY — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:22:08 +0000

If the Celtics lose Eddie House, They will sure erase a huge part of their chemistry. House was definitely motvated in his role, and capabile of killing you off the bench, which is something he relished! They saw what happened when their chemistry was damaged by injury, and you talk about letting the best shooter off the bench, who is always motivatede in his role. I would hold the trigger.