Comments on: Otis Smith Doesn’t Like Big Baby http://celticshub.com/2009/07/06/otis-smith-doesnt-like-big-baby/ Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:01:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: jose l http://celticshub.com/2009/07/06/otis-smith-doesnt-like-big-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-4967 jose l Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:03:04 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=2698#comment-4967 ...same players different roles...I can live with that...again one heck of a bench... …same players different roles…I can live with that…again one heck of a bench…

]]> By: NHcelticsfan http://celticshub.com/2009/07/06/otis-smith-doesnt-like-big-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-4949 NHcelticsfan Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:19:00 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=2698#comment-4949 Eddie is a scorer NOT a PG!! Also I'll take Sheed over Baby ANYDAY Eddie is a scorer NOT a PG!!
Also I’ll take Sheed over Baby ANYDAY

]]> By: Alex http://celticshub.com/2009/07/06/otis-smith-doesnt-like-big-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-4942 Alex Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:59:26 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=2698#comment-4942 ok how about everything you all have said, the same, EXCEPT, i would switch hill and eddie's role..., HILL point ..< better ball handler.. and eddie shooting guard..!??..hmm ok how about everything you all have said, the same, EXCEPT, i would switch hill and eddie’s role…, HILL point ..< better ball handler.. and eddie shooting guard..!??..hmm

]]> By: Jose L http://celticshub.com/2009/07/06/otis-smith-doesnt-like-big-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-4920 Jose L Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:50:33 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=2698#comment-4920 how about Eddie at point; Sheed at center; Powe at PF; baby at SF; and Hill at SG...that would be one formidable bench...you could still have another point and one more big man on the bench... how about Eddie at point; Sheed at center; Powe at PF; baby at SF; and Hill at SG…that would be one formidable bench…you could still have another point and one more big man on the bench…

]]> By: giacomo http://celticshub.com/2009/07/06/otis-smith-doesnt-like-big-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-4911 giacomo Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:13:21 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=2698#comment-4911 i don't understand: we're going to sign Wallace-34- and to lose Davis-23! The first is on his worst season ever, the second is growing up every year. Danny, what are you doing? you have to think about our future, not only about the next year. i don’t understand: we’re going to sign Wallace-34- and to lose Davis-23! The first is on his worst season ever, the second is growing up every year. Danny, what are you doing? you have to think about our future, not only about the next year.

]]> By: jay http://celticshub.com/2009/07/06/otis-smith-doesnt-like-big-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-4878 jay Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:01:42 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=2698#comment-4878 If we get him back, its great for us. Sheed backing up Perk at center, baby playing the PF spot in the second string. That's a hell of a second string front court, would have to be excited about that. But yes, we need a backup PG, I certainly wont be excited if Eddie House is filling that role. If we get him back, its great for us. Sheed backing up Perk at center, baby playing the PF spot in the second string. That’s a hell of a second string front court, would have to be excited about that.

But yes, we need a backup PG, I certainly wont be excited if Eddie House is filling that role.

]]> By: jim the great http://celticshub.com/2009/07/06/otis-smith-doesnt-like-big-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-4865 jim the great Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:29:04 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=2698#comment-4865 sheed, hill, baby and house would complete a very solid 9 man rotation. just need a point off the bench. have 2 be considered fave in east right now. sheed, hill, baby and house would complete a very solid 9 man rotation. just need a point off the bench. have 2 be considered fave in east right now.

]]>