<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Baby smart for taking 2 year deal? Is Marbury off C&#8217;s radar?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celticshub.com/2009/08/08/is-baby-smart-for-taking-2-year-deal-is-marbury-off-cs-radar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/08/08/is-baby-smart-for-taking-2-year-deal-is-marbury-off-cs-radar/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:17:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Green17</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/08/08/is-baby-smart-for-taking-2-year-deal-is-marbury-off-cs-radar/comment-page-1/#comment-6883</link>
		<dc:creator>Green17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2972#comment-6883</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m happy the BBD is staying with the team.  It will only improve his value in 2 years.  Now, lets focus on resigning Powe!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy the BBD is staying with the team.  It will only improve his value in 2 years.  Now, lets focus on resigning Powe!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/08/08/is-baby-smart-for-taking-2-year-deal-is-marbury-off-cs-radar/comment-page-1/#comment-6718</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2972#comment-6718</guid>
		<description>the celtics need to focus on gettin a good veteran point guard im disapointed that marbury is no longer in that category but nonetheless the backup pg. position is a vital spot that must be filled. and unless daniels doesnt get the bianual exeception either giddens, walker, scalabrine, allen could be in Indiana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the celtics need to focus on gettin a good veteran point guard im disapointed that marbury is no longer in that category but nonetheless the backup pg. position is a vital spot that must be filled. and unless daniels doesnt get the bianual exeception either giddens, walker, scalabrine, allen could be in Indiana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New England Sports 24/7, Your place for the Red Sox, Celtics, Patriots, and Bruins :: Today&#8217;s Celtics Links 8/9</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/08/08/is-baby-smart-for-taking-2-year-deal-is-marbury-off-cs-radar/comment-page-1/#comment-6706</link>
		<dc:creator>New England Sports 24/7, Your place for the Red Sox, Celtics, Patriots, and Bruins :: Today&#8217;s Celtics Links 8/9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2972#comment-6706</guid>
		<description>[...] All Coming Together Celtics Hub   Roster Update: Fourteen Spots Filled, Mammoth Tax Bill Coming  Is Baby smart for taking 2 year deal? Is Marbury off C’s radar?  NESN    Report: Big Baby Close to Signing With Celtics  North Station Sports     Big Baby [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All Coming Together Celtics Hub   Roster Update: Fourteen Spots Filled, Mammoth Tax Bill Coming  Is Baby smart for taking 2 year deal? Is Marbury off C’s radar?  NESN    Report: Big Baby Close to Signing With Celtics  North Station Sports     Big Baby [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/08/08/is-baby-smart-for-taking-2-year-deal-is-marbury-off-cs-radar/comment-page-1/#comment-6705</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2972#comment-6705</guid>
		<description>Ahhhh...big baby Davis....reality checked you HARD!
I&#039;m glad your back with my c&#039;s. I&#039;m also glad we were smart enough to wait you and your agent out. U need us mrs than we need you. Your hustle and versitility are a key to our bench, and our team success is key to your financial future. Players who are just above average but who play for winners get Paid actually over paid very often...so smart move for all involved. You improve your game help us win a title or two and the c&#039;s or anyother team will pay u depending on the market. Side note I don&#039;t think saying daniels is part of the c&#039;s is cool! He isn&#039;t signed! Boozer ring a bell?&quot; Yeah Cleveland I&#039;m with u all the way!&quot; &quot;oh hello Utah!&quot;
So when he and bbd are inked and intro&#039;d then they are c&#039;s so till then don&#039;t count them in it&#039;s a bit presumptuous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhhh&#8230;big baby Davis&#8230;.reality checked you HARD!<br />
I&#8217;m glad your back with my c&#8217;s. I&#8217;m also glad we were smart enough to wait you and your agent out. U need us mrs than we need you. Your hustle and versitility are a key to our bench, and our team success is key to your financial future. Players who are just above average but who play for winners get Paid actually over paid very often&#8230;so smart move for all involved. You improve your game help us win a title or two and the c&#8217;s or anyother team will pay u depending on the market. Side note I don&#8217;t think saying daniels is part of the c&#8217;s is cool! He isn&#8217;t signed! Boozer ring a bell?&#8221; Yeah Cleveland I&#8217;m with u all the way!&#8221; &#8220;oh hello Utah!&#8221;<br />
So when he and bbd are inked and intro&#8217;d then they are c&#8217;s so till then don&#8217;t count them in it&#8217;s a bit presumptuous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirby</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/08/08/is-baby-smart-for-taking-2-year-deal-is-marbury-off-cs-radar/comment-page-1/#comment-6697</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 16:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2972#comment-6697</guid>
		<description>Signing Big Baby under these circumstances is great for the Celtics and mediocre for Baby.  

The Celts get him for a lower price than they would have normally get one of the best back up big men in the league.

For Baby, this isn&#039;t the greatest of circumstances.  First off, the Celtics added Rasheed Wallace and Shelden Williams.  Only Rasheed is going to challenge Baby for those minutes.  I just don&#039;t know where his minutes are going to come from though.  Maybe with Leon Powe on the way out, it looks like there will be more minutes for Davis.  Second, Davis doesn&#039;t have a chance to start anywhere.  He proved he can play solidly, albeit inconsistently, in the starting role.  It stinks for him that he has to back up KG and split time with Rasheed Wallace instead of starting somewhere.  But, I&#039;m happy that we get back a great prospect and he might be starting when KG retires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Signing Big Baby under these circumstances is great for the Celtics and mediocre for Baby.  </p>
<p>The Celts get him for a lower price than they would have normally get one of the best back up big men in the league.</p>
<p>For Baby, this isn&#8217;t the greatest of circumstances.  First off, the Celtics added Rasheed Wallace and Shelden Williams.  Only Rasheed is going to challenge Baby for those minutes.  I just don&#8217;t know where his minutes are going to come from though.  Maybe with Leon Powe on the way out, it looks like there will be more minutes for Davis.  Second, Davis doesn&#8217;t have a chance to start anywhere.  He proved he can play solidly, albeit inconsistently, in the starting role.  It stinks for him that he has to back up KG and split time with Rasheed Wallace instead of starting somewhere.  But, I&#8217;m happy that we get back a great prospect and he might be starting when KG retires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan lugo</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/08/08/is-baby-smart-for-taking-2-year-deal-is-marbury-off-cs-radar/comment-page-1/#comment-6682</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan lugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 04:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2972#comment-6682</guid>
		<description>gen davis your&#039;e the man for real keep it up!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gen davis your&#8217;e the man for real keep it up!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/08/08/is-baby-smart-for-taking-2-year-deal-is-marbury-off-cs-radar/comment-page-1/#comment-6674</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=2972#comment-6674</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think it was a smart move for Glen Davis. He was only likely to play 10-20 minutes a game next season, and it would have been very difficult for him to prove himself worthy of an MLE type contract with so little court time.

The two year deal was the best he could do. Good business for BBD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think it was a smart move for Glen Davis. He was only likely to play 10-20 minutes a game next season, and it would have been very difficult for him to prove himself worthy of an MLE type contract with so little court time.</p>
<p>The two year deal was the best he could do. Good business for BBD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
