Comments on: Q-Richardson the X-Factor? http://celticshub.com/2009/08/12/q-richardson-the-x-factor/ Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:35:50 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: New England Sports 24/7, Your place for the Red Sox, Celtics, Patriots, and Bruins :: Today’s Celtics Links 8/13 http://celticshub.com/2009/08/12/q-richardson-the-x-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-6999 New England Sports 24/7, Your place for the Red Sox, Celtics, Patriots, and Bruins :: Today’s Celtics Links 8/13 Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:31:33 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=3026#comment-6999 [...] Ever… “ Celtics Circuit    The Best Frontcourt in Celtics History? Celtics Hub   Q-Richardson the X-Factor? North Station Sports    Celtics Show No Love for Leon Our Chronicals of the Original Big Three [...] [...] Ever… “ Celtics Circuit    The Best Frontcourt in Celtics History? Celtics Hub   Q-Richardson the X-Factor? North Station Sports    Celtics Show No Love for Leon Our Chronicals of the Original Big Three [...]

]]> By: Pasard http://celticshub.com/2009/08/12/q-richardson-the-x-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-6996 Pasard Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:08:15 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=3026#comment-6996 I'm stating the obvious in I forgot all about Vin Baker playing for the C's. I forgot yesterday in one sports converstation that Don Baylor played for the Red Sox. I’m stating the obvious in I forgot all about Vin Baker playing for the C’s. I forgot yesterday in one sports converstation that Don Baylor played for the Red Sox.

]]> By: Today’s Headlines « http://celticshub.com/2009/08/12/q-richardson-the-x-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-6991 Today’s Headlines « Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:00:21 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=3026#comment-6991 [...] Celtics Hub                      Q-Richardson the X-Factor [...] [...] Celtics Hub                      Q-Richardson the X-Factor [...]

]]> By: reg35 http://celticshub.com/2009/08/12/q-richardson-the-x-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-6988 reg35 Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:33:30 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=3026#comment-6988 why would the Celts want to overpay Daniels at 5.4M per? Makes no sense A trade that makes sense is Scal to Indiana, TA & Giddens to NJ, Dooling & Daniels back (Daniels at about 2.5M per). Works for all 3 teams- gets Larry a guy who won't assault anyone, NJ cap relief for next year's big FA push, the C's a backup PG with size & range to pair with Eddie and Daniels. why would the Celts want to overpay Daniels at 5.4M per? Makes no sense

A trade that makes sense is Scal to Indiana, TA & Giddens to NJ, Dooling & Daniels back (Daniels at about 2.5M per). Works for all 3 teams- gets Larry a guy who won’t assault anyone, NJ cap relief for next year’s big FA push, the C’s a backup PG with size & range to pair with Eddie and Daniels.

]]> By: Brendan Jackson http://celticshub.com/2009/08/12/q-richardson-the-x-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-6970 Brendan Jackson Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:48:57 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=3026#comment-6970 @Tom I'm pretty sure Richardson can be included in any trade on or after September 20th, the post cites and explains T'Wolves roster concerns, and Indiana only has one shooting guard on the roster who is not even a pure shooter in Brandon Rush so I'd say it makes a lot of sense for depth reasons. @TWolfPack with Richardson pseudo-publicly on the trade block I don't see the T'Wolves getting anything but expiring contracts for him. In other words, I don't see another team giving up a quality player for Richardson, but maybe I'm wrong. @Tom
I’m pretty sure Richardson can be included in any trade on or after September 20th, the post cites and explains T’Wolves roster concerns, and Indiana only has one shooting guard on the roster who is not even a pure shooter in Brandon Rush so I’d say it makes a lot of sense for depth reasons.
@TWolfPack
with Richardson pseudo-publicly on the trade block I don’t see the T’Wolves getting anything but expiring contracts for him. In other words, I don’t see another team giving up a quality player for Richardson, but maybe I’m wrong.

]]> By: TWolfPack http://celticshub.com/2009/08/12/q-richardson-the-x-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-6969 TWolfPack Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:36:47 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=3026#comment-6969 Why would the Wolves trade Richardson for expiring contracts when he's already an expiring contract? Why would the Wolves trade Richardson for expiring contracts when he’s already an expiring contract?

]]> By: Tom http://celticshub.com/2009/08/12/q-richardson-the-x-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-6968 Tom Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:20:24 +0000 http://celticshub.com/?p=3026#comment-6968 Players who had been traded can't be dealt in a multi player deal until after 90 days if I recall correctly, also the Wolves won't have the roster space to house four new players. Lastly, the trade makes no sense to Indiana.... Players who had been traded can’t be dealt in a multi player deal until after 90 days if I recall correctly, also the Wolves won’t have the roster space to house four new players.

Lastly, the trade makes no sense to Indiana….

]]>