<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celtics at a loss in New York</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celticshub.com/2009/10/20/celtics-at-a-loss-in-new-york/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/10/20/celtics-at-a-loss-in-new-york/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:35:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ieshoes</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/10/20/celtics-at-a-loss-in-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-10926</link>
		<dc:creator>ieshoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=3675#comment-10926</guid>
		<description>Good Kevin Garnett Paul Pierce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Kevin Garnett Paul Pierce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/10/20/celtics-at-a-loss-in-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-10895</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=3675#comment-10895</guid>
		<description>This is all spot on. 

I will add I believe 3 of Perk&#039;s TOs came on just about consecutive possessions in his last few minutes of the game. It felt like with the line-up around him and the point of the game and preseason (meaning it&#039;s all zero risk), the staff gave him (or maybe Perk just took) a few opportunities to be the focal point of the offense. He tried but failed to make an interior pass (twice I think, though I think I recall some major uncalled over-the-back) and he lost the ball or was stripped/fouled the other time. These are outlier possessions, not indicative at all of the offense the C&#039;s will run. Add to that the second unit got sloppy at the end of the game against the Knicks starters, you could argue the meaningful TOs were more in the low-teen range. Plus, this game, like all Knicks games, are high-possession affairs, more chances for everything (shots, rebounds and yes TOs) and actually this wasn&#039;t that bad a performance from a TO perspective. Then again, the Knicks don&#039;t really play tough D, do they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all spot on. </p>
<p>I will add I believe 3 of Perk&#8217;s TOs came on just about consecutive possessions in his last few minutes of the game. It felt like with the line-up around him and the point of the game and preseason (meaning it&#8217;s all zero risk), the staff gave him (or maybe Perk just took) a few opportunities to be the focal point of the offense. He tried but failed to make an interior pass (twice I think, though I think I recall some major uncalled over-the-back) and he lost the ball or was stripped/fouled the other time. These are outlier possessions, not indicative at all of the offense the C&#8217;s will run. Add to that the second unit got sloppy at the end of the game against the Knicks starters, you could argue the meaningful TOs were more in the low-teen range. Plus, this game, like all Knicks games, are high-possession affairs, more chances for everything (shots, rebounds and yes TOs) and actually this wasn&#8217;t that bad a performance from a TO perspective. Then again, the Knicks don&#8217;t really play tough D, do they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
