<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crunching The Numbers: Pierce is shooting over 50% from 3 &amp; other eyeopening stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celticshub.com/2009/11/11/crunching-the-numbers-pierce-is-shooting-over-50-from-3-other-eyeopening-stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/11/11/crunching-the-numbers-pierce-is-shooting-over-50-from-3-other-eyeopening-stats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:01:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John V</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/11/11/crunching-the-numbers-pierce-is-shooting-over-50-from-3-other-eyeopening-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-13107</link>
		<dc:creator>John V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=4148#comment-13107</guid>
		<description>I agree that Rasheed&#039;s shot selection has been poor, and I&#039;m disappointed by it.  The only thing I&#039;d say is that that stats, in and of themselves, are not necessarily a problem.  I don&#039;t care if he takes 7 threes a game, if they&#039;re open threes.  And, given the Cs other options, it&#039;s conceivable they could be.  In fact, it&#039;s conceivable he *would* get that many open threes, if he&#039;d rotate the ball and let it come back to him.  Instead he&#039;s just firing away.  I&#039;m not too thrilled with his interior defense, either.

I don&#039;t care if he never posts up on offense, and I certainly don&#039;t want him having Scal/Rondo/Marbury-like hesitation to take open jumpers.  I just think he needs to scale back the highly contested threes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Rasheed&#8217;s shot selection has been poor, and I&#8217;m disappointed by it.  The only thing I&#8217;d say is that that stats, in and of themselves, are not necessarily a problem.  I don&#8217;t care if he takes 7 threes a game, if they&#8217;re open threes.  And, given the Cs other options, it&#8217;s conceivable they could be.  In fact, it&#8217;s conceivable he *would* get that many open threes, if he&#8217;d rotate the ball and let it come back to him.  Instead he&#8217;s just firing away.  I&#8217;m not too thrilled with his interior defense, either.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care if he never posts up on offense, and I certainly don&#8217;t want him having Scal/Rondo/Marbury-like hesitation to take open jumpers.  I just think he needs to scale back the highly contested threes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJE</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/11/11/crunching-the-numbers-pierce-is-shooting-over-50-from-3-other-eyeopening-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-13094</link>
		<dc:creator>DJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=4148#comment-13094</guid>
		<description>On raw +/- at NBA.com you can see that Boston plays best when Perk is on the court - he plays the least minutes of starters (which is not so good, something to do with over-zealous defence I think) but team performs best when he is on-court, perhaps because no-one else can do the grunt work like he does.

Question for Brian / Zac: Dean Oliver is not a big fan of running up the score, do you think this is what Boston has been doing so far? And do you agree with him - I don&#039;t know, because points differential is one of best indicators we have of success ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On raw +/- at NBA.com you can see that Boston plays best when Perk is on the court &#8211; he plays the least minutes of starters (which is not so good, something to do with over-zealous defence I think) but team performs best when he is on-court, perhaps because no-one else can do the grunt work like he does.</p>
<p>Question for Brian / Zac: Dean Oliver is not a big fan of running up the score, do you think this is what Boston has been doing so far? And do you agree with him &#8211; I don&#8217;t know, because points differential is one of best indicators we have of success &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mid-Afternoon Milk Mustache, featuring Crow Enchiladas &#124; Stacheketball, an NBA Blog</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/11/11/crunching-the-numbers-pierce-is-shooting-over-50-from-3-other-eyeopening-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-13088</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mid-Afternoon Milk Mustache, featuring Crow Enchiladas &#124; Stacheketball, an NBA Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=4148#comment-13088</guid>
		<description>[...] The Lampshade: Chew on this, through eight games, Shelden Williams has shot more free throws than Kevin Garnett and Rasheed Wallace combined. Five Celtics statistical anomalies brought to light. [Celtics Hub] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Lampshade: Chew on this, through eight games, Shelden Williams has shot more free throws than Kevin Garnett and Rasheed Wallace combined. Five Celtics statistical anomalies brought to light. [Celtics Hub] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/11/11/crunching-the-numbers-pierce-is-shooting-over-50-from-3-other-eyeopening-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-13073</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=4148#comment-13073</guid>
		<description>At least the turtle shoots better than Rondo and Perk at the line!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least the turtle shoots better than Rondo and Perk at the line!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeVelaine</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/11/11/crunching-the-numbers-pierce-is-shooting-over-50-from-3-other-eyeopening-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-13071</link>
		<dc:creator>DeVelaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=4148#comment-13071</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve made a point this year to track these stats myself, updating my own spreadsheet after every game. I completely glossed over most of the individual stats as I&#039;ve been more interested in trying to get a lot of numbers that I feel useful to track.

It&#039;s interesting to note some of the things you&#039;ve mentioned, including Sheed&#039;s horrible accuracy from deep. If we take out his attempts from deep (17-50), the team is shooting just under 43.3% from three. As it is, we&#039;re still over 40%. And it&#039;s only a matter of time before those start falling for him again.

As for Sheldon&#039;s FTs... I don&#039;t have numbers for garbage time, but if you want to count all of the Charlotte game as garbage time (cause it really was), that removes an 8-11 game from his totals. All of the close games or difficult games to win? He&#039;s perfect from the stripe at 10-10 (Cavs, T&#039;Wolves, and Nets, actually).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve made a point this year to track these stats myself, updating my own spreadsheet after every game. I completely glossed over most of the individual stats as I&#8217;ve been more interested in trying to get a lot of numbers that I feel useful to track.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to note some of the things you&#8217;ve mentioned, including Sheed&#8217;s horrible accuracy from deep. If we take out his attempts from deep (17-50), the team is shooting just under 43.3% from three. As it is, we&#8217;re still over 40%. And it&#8217;s only a matter of time before those start falling for him again.</p>
<p>As for Sheldon&#8217;s FTs&#8230; I don&#8217;t have numbers for garbage time, but if you want to count all of the Charlotte game as garbage time (cause it really was), that removes an 8-11 game from his totals. All of the close games or difficult games to win? He&#8217;s perfect from the stripe at 10-10 (Cavs, T&#8217;Wolves, and Nets, actually).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Robb</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/11/11/crunching-the-numbers-pierce-is-shooting-over-50-from-3-other-eyeopening-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-13070</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=4148#comment-13070</guid>
		<description>Good question Mr. Lowe. Upon inspection, it has been revealed 15 of Shelden&#039;s 29 free throws came during the 4th quarters of the home blowouts against Charlotte and Chicago. That makes the stat a bit less daunting but even without those garbage time free throws, Williams still matches Garnett&#039;s FT attempts for the season at 14 and beats Wallace&#039;s easily (9). Thus I am still disturbed by those numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question Mr. Lowe. Upon inspection, it has been revealed 15 of Shelden&#8217;s 29 free throws came during the 4th quarters of the home blowouts against Charlotte and Chicago. That makes the stat a bit less daunting but even without those garbage time free throws, Williams still matches Garnett&#8217;s FT attempts for the season at 14 and beats Wallace&#8217;s easily (9). Thus I am still disturbed by those numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Lowe</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2009/11/11/crunching-the-numbers-pierce-is-shooting-over-50-from-3-other-eyeopening-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-13067</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=4148#comment-13067</guid>
		<description>How many of Shelden&#039;s FTs have been in garbage time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many of Shelden&#8217;s FTs have been in garbage time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
