<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Shot at Some Definitive Trade Conclusions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celticshub.com/2010/02/05/a-shot-at-some-definitive-trade-conclusions-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/02/05/a-shot-at-some-definitive-trade-conclusions-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/02/05/a-shot-at-some-definitive-trade-conclusions-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24348</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=5828#comment-24348</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts about Ramon Sessions?  I&#039;ve been impressed with him whenever I&#039;ve seen him play and he generally seems undervalued in the league.  Not sure if the T-Wolves are looking to trade him, but he&#039;d fill an important role on this team as back-up PG in the short-term while being young enough to continue to grow as a player and remain useful to the Cs down the road [something which acquiring a veteran PG wouldn&#039;t accomplish.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts about Ramon Sessions?  I&#8217;ve been impressed with him whenever I&#8217;ve seen him play and he generally seems undervalued in the league.  Not sure if the T-Wolves are looking to trade him, but he&#8217;d fill an important role on this team as back-up PG in the short-term while being young enough to continue to grow as a player and remain useful to the Cs down the road [something which acquiring a veteran PG wouldn't accomplish.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NV</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/02/05/a-shot-at-some-definitive-trade-conclusions-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24318</link>
		<dc:creator>NV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=5828#comment-24318</guid>
		<description>Good. Considering that I hate the idea of any (so far) proposed trade with the Bulls I&#039;m glad that the John Salmons trade won&#039;t go down. I think the C&#039;s should at least give a shot at working something out with Philly for Andre though! That would be a sweet trade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. Considering that I hate the idea of any (so far) proposed trade with the Bulls I&#8217;m glad that the John Salmons trade won&#8217;t go down. I think the C&#8217;s should at least give a shot at working something out with Philly for Andre though! That would be a sweet trade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/02/05/a-shot-at-some-definitive-trade-conclusions-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24307</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=5828#comment-24307</guid>
		<description>@notsmart
Ellis needs the ball too much and I think his defense is so so. I like the idea of buying out Ray and I think thats the only reason I&#039;d trade Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@notsmart<br />
Ellis needs the ball too much and I think his defense is so so. I like the idea of buying out Ray and I think thats the only reason I&#8217;d trade Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Lowe</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/02/05/a-shot-at-some-definitive-trade-conclusions-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24283</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=5828#comment-24283</guid>
		<description>@ssspence: That&#039;s also my impression from my reading of Salary Cap FAQ. (That the cap hold can&#039;t be bigger than the max salary, so I believe DraftExpress is wrong).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ssspence: That&#8217;s also my impression from my reading of Salary Cap FAQ. (That the cap hold can&#8217;t be bigger than the max salary, so I believe DraftExpress is wrong).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notsmart</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/02/05/a-shot-at-some-definitive-trade-conclusions-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24282</link>
		<dc:creator>notsmart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=5828#comment-24282</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why the combined 20m a year for Ellis and Maggette is so bad for the c&#039;s. Ellis is only 24, and roughly 10 million a piece for each player sounds like a bargain. If GSW were to buy out Ray Allen I don&#039;t see how the C&#039;s could pass that up? Anyone want to shed some light on that for me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why the combined 20m a year for Ellis and Maggette is so bad for the c&#8217;s. Ellis is only 24, and roughly 10 million a piece for each player sounds like a bargain. If GSW were to buy out Ray Allen I don&#8217;t see how the C&#8217;s could pass that up? Anyone want to shed some light on that for me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

