That’s per Art Garcia writing at NBA.com:
Ainge said every possible trade avenue using Wallace’s contract was explored after it became clear he wasn’t returning. Wallace was owed $13 million for the final two years of the three-year deal. The Celtics likely bought out the remainder of the contract.
Whatever the C’s paid Wallace will count against the cap and the luxury tax bill. The exact figure remains unknown at this point. In any case, you can toss away those dreams of the C’s getting a quality piece in return for Wallace’s contract. With Sheed officially gone, Boston has one roster spot open and precious expendable resources with which to fill it via trade.
The Rasheed Wallace experiment is over, and it was a failure. Onto the next.

Quirks of the C’s Schedule, Part I
August 11th, 2010The 2011 schedule is out. You can view Boston’s schedule here, and SB Nation has a handy list of all 30 NBA team schedules here.
The first thing I look for when the schedule comes out is the number of back-to-backs Boston plays. The second end of a back-to-back is among the toughest games to win; several studies have shown that teams on the second night of a back-to-back have a winning percentage of about .430. That’s not good.
Some good news: Boston has 19 back-to-backs next season, one more than last year and a number that places them in the bottom third of the league in back-to-backs. (The Bulls and Bucks have the most, with 23 each, and 14 teams have at least 21 back-to-backs, according to Basketball Prospectus. The Lakers have the fewest—just 15).
Good news, right? An older team can use a few breaks from the schedule makers.
But dig one level deeper, and the news isn’t quite as good. » More: Quirks of the C’s Schedule, Part I
12 Comments »
Posted in Commentary, Features