Archive for the ‘Three-man weave’ Category

Editor’s Note: This is the second of a three-part “three-man weave” on CelticsHub.com. Check back tomorrow afternoon for another fresh perspective.

(AP Photo/Michael Dwyer)

Call me overconfident but I am not overly worried about the Celtics lack of success playing elite teams this year. When you look at the Celtics 1-4 record against these teams, I think the quotes Jeff Clark of Celticsblog pulled from Paul Pierce and Doc Rivers at the end of the Spurs game explain my lack of anxiety:

Pierce: “When you play the top teams in the league, it comes down to the little things. One play can kill you. Every possession counts, and we’ve got to understand that when we play against the top-tier teams like the Spurs and the Lakers.”

Rivers echoed Pierce’s comments about executing the little things and went further.

“Well it tells me that we’re really good, because we’ve not played with our A-game and we still had a chance to win both.”

That last quote by Rivers sums it up for me perfectly right there. In each of these five games the Celtics have not played a complete game. Even in the season opener against Cleveland they won, they were not impressive and benefited from Lebron James choking on some free throws down the stretch.

Despite the C’s not playing well they nearly went 3-2 in these games. A couple breaks go our way such as KG fouling out on a phantom call against LA, and the bizarre Ray Allen turnover at the end of the San Antonio game and we would likely not even be having this discussion.

The encouraging thing is that despite not playing a complete game the Celtics could have stolen both of these games. However they didn’t and we shouldn’t have expected them too. The ball didn’t fall our way either of these nights. It happens.

» More: Sound off: Am I worried the C’s are 1-4 against Los Angeles, San Antonio and Cleveland?

Editor’s Note: This is the first of a three-part “three-man weave” on CelticsHub.com. Check back tomorrow afternoon for another fresh perspective.

(AP Photo/Bill Kostroun)

When I see this question, I interpret it as asking me this: Do these regular season losses mean the Celtics are more likely to lose to these teams in the playoffs?

I don’t think they do. Look, of course we’d all like the C’s to be 4-1 in those games, but to sit here and wring our hands over a team that’s 42-11 is a bit ridiculous and something fans of 26 teams in the league would roll their eyes at.

The fact is, three of those losses were toss-ups late in the fourth quarter; only the game at Cleveland was one-sided, and that was the Celtics third game in four days — in the middle of their worst stretch since the Big 3 arrived.

Plus, the Celtics are 2-0 against Orlando, a team that was a real, true blue championship contender before Jameer Nelson’s injury. That makes the Celtics 3-4 against championship contenders, and that doesn’t look so bad.

Are there concerns with this team? Sure. If there are two constants in those four losses, they are these:

1. The Celtics turn the ball over too much.
2. Those four teams shot comfortably over 40 percent from three-point range in those four games.

There’s nothing to be done about the first concern. The Celtics are what they are, and they turn the ball over a lot. The second concern is a bit more worrying. Celtics opponents are shooting 34 percent from deep this season, still good, but a significant notch higher than last season’s 30.5 percent mark. Is this just random statistical noise?

Are the Celtics saving their maniacal close-outs for the playoffs? Does the team get tired more easily after last year’s prolonged playoff run? I’m not sure what the answer is.

» More: Sound off: Am I worried the C’s are 1-4 against Los Angeles, San Antonio and Cleveland?