<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boston Celtics Basketball - Celtics news, rumors and analysis - CelticsHub.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celticshub.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celticshub.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:48:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ohio Beats Georgetown and EVERYONE&#8217;S Bracket is Now Busted</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/18/ohio-beats-georgetown-and-everyones-bracket-is-now-busted/</link>
		<comments>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/18/ohio-beats-georgetown-and-everyones-bracket-is-now-busted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Annoucements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=6837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay everyone.  Don&#8217;t even pretend that you picked the Bobcats over the Hoyas (unless of course, Ohio is your Alma Mater.  I&#8217;ve been known to wrongly play favoritism for mine whenever BC gets into the tourney).  But seriously, did anyone see this coming?
Not only did Ohio upset Georgetown in the first round, they did so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay everyone.  Don&#8217;t even pretend that you picked the Bobcats over the Hoyas (unless of course, Ohio is your Alma Mater.  I&#8217;ve been known to <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">wrongly</span> play favoritism for mine whenever BC gets into the tourney).  But seriously, did anyone see this coming?</p>
<p>Not only did Ohio upset Georgetown in the first round, they did so handily.  Ohio beat Georgetown by 14 points by devastating the Hoyas from the three point line.  Georgetown also plays in arguably the most competitive conference in the entire NCAA, the Big East.  This upset is simply unprecedented.  Ohio guard Armon Bassett decimated the Hoyas from the arc, going 5-10 from deep and scoring a game high 32 points.  If you&#8217;re a small guard (Bassett is only 6&#8242;2&#8243;), you either have to light is up or dish it out- both of which has been exemplified by the rookie back-court from New Orleans (who are currently getting shelled by the Nuggets).</p>
<p>The question remains: what does this have to do with the Celtics? Or even the NBA?  Does this Ohio team exhibit the virtues of being small, crafty, and fast in a game for giants?  Do the comparisons of the Celtics and the Ohio Bobcats stop at their green uniforms?</p>
<p>The answer: none of the above.</p>
<p>Armon Bassett is from Terre Haute, Indiana.  The city where Larry Bird not only played his college ball, but took a little-known Indiana State team to the National  Championship game.</p>
<p>If this post gets you to do anything, I hope it gets you to read Jackie MacMullan&#8217;s <em>When the Game Was Ours. </em>It is beyond worth it.</p>
<p>Enjoy March Madness everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/18/ohio-beats-georgetown-and-everyones-bracket-is-now-busted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nate Robinson: Boorish Clown or Righteously Angry?</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/18/nate-robinson-boorish-clown-or-righteously-angry/</link>
		<comments>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/18/nate-robinson-boorish-clown-or-righteously-angry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Lowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=6833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You decide (via the NY Daily News, who put the story of my beloved Sandra Bullock&#8217;s cheating husband on the front page this morning. I told you, Sandra! If it weren&#8217;t for the restraining order, you&#8217;d realize that what we both has been right in front of us all along!):
Nate Robinson rose from his seat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You decide (via the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/knicks/2010/03/17/2010-03-17_nate_whoops_it_up_as_celts_drop_knicks.html" target="_blank">NY Daily News</a>, who put the story of my beloved Sandra Bullock&#8217;s cheating husband on the front page this morning. I told you, Sandra! If it weren&#8217;t for the restraining order, you&#8217;d realize that what we both has been right in front of us all along!):</p>
<p><a title="Nate Robinson" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/Nate+Robinson"><strong><em>Nate Robinson</em></strong></a><strong><em> rose from his seat on the Celtics bench, looked at </em></strong><a title="Mike D'Antoni" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/Mike+D'Antoni"><strong><em>Mike D&#8217;Antoni</em></strong></a><strong><em> and began clapping.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Lil&#8217; Him wasn&#8217;t honoring his former coach Wednesday night as much as he was taunting him. With Boston building a 27-point third-quarter lead over the </em></strong><a title="New York Knicks" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/topics/New+York+Knicks"><strong><em>Knicks</em></strong></a><strong><em>, Robinson twice made it a point to show that he was enjoying D&#8217;Antoni&#8217;s misery.</em></strong></p>
<p>First of all, I hate the nickname Lil&#8217; Him or L&#8217;il Him or, really, Lil&#8217; anything. Second, I&#8217;m not totally anti-Nate here. In general, it drives me crazy when fringe NBA players carry on about meaningless accomplishments, and scoring 8 points in a blowout win against a horrible team fits the definition of &#8220;meaningless.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-6833"></span></p>
<p>But Mike D&#8217;Antoni, a fantastic coach and a nice guy, has for two years now yanked players in and out of his rotation on what sometimes seems to be his personal whim. He banished Stephon Marbury only to ask him to play&#8212;<a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/knicks/item_K6srvy8VeIsckZmh7ObGjP" target="_blank">and perhaps even start</a>&#8212;when injuries decimated New York&#8217;s back court in November 2008. Marbury said no. He benched Nate Robinson for 14 games, then gave him playing time again, then talked about starting him and then benched him again. Now he&#8217;s on the Celtics. Chris Duhon went from starting and playing 30 minutes a game to being out of the rotation to being back in the rotation whenever D&#8217;Antoni tires of watching Sergio Rodriguez play &#8220;defense.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is not all on D&#8217;Antoni. Marbury&#8217;s a loon and had become a $20 million no-defense distraction. Robinson acted the buffoon, drew attention to himself at the expense of the team and played recklessly at times. Duhon, I&#8217;m sorry to say, stinks.</p>
<p>Still: It&#8217;s not hard to understand why Robinson would hold a grudge against D&#8217;Antoni.</p>
<p>Was this really the appropriate circumstance in which to express that grudge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/18/nate-robinson-boorish-clown-or-righteously-angry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Could Be Interesting</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/18/this-could-be-interesting/</link>
		<comments>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/18/this-could-be-interesting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Lowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=6826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you believe in regular season tests and the importance of getting into a nice groove before the playoffs, you should probably start watching the Celtics now.
Here comes the toughest prolonged stretch of the schedule this season:
3/19: @ Houston (35-31)
3/20: @ Dallas  (46-22)
3/22: @ Utah (44-24)
3/24: vs Denver (46-22)
3/26: vs Sacramento (23-45)
3/28: vs San Antonio [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you believe in regular season tests and the importance of getting into a nice groove before the playoffs, you should probably start watching the Celtics now.</p>
<p>Here comes the toughest prolonged stretch of the schedule this season:</p>
<p>3/19: @ Houston (35-31)</p>
<p>3/20: @ Dallas  (46-22)</p>
<p>3/22: @ Utah (44-24)</p>
<p>3/24: vs Denver (46-22)</p>
<p>3/26: vs Sacramento (23-45)</p>
<p>3/28: vs San Antonio (40-26)</p>
<p>3/31: vs Oklahoma City (41-25)</p>
<p>4/2: vs Houston (35-31)</p>
<p>4/4: vs Cleveland (54-15)</p>
<p>Yikes. That&#8217;s nine games against teams with a combined 364-241 (.601) record. Sure, six of those games are at home, but a) these are really good teams; and b) we all know what Boston has done at home this season.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the verdict: Does this stretch constitute a referendum on how good this team is right now? Are you looking for proof they can hang with the good teams? Or is this just another string of irrelevant regular-season games before the post-season starts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/18/this-could-be-interesting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Popularity of the Beast</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/18/the-popularity-of-the-beast/</link>
		<comments>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/18/the-popularity-of-the-beast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Lowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=6828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He turns the ball over a lot. He can&#8217;t really shoot foul shots. He&#8217;s grouchy, ranks 3rd in the league in technicals and slumped through much of January and February.
But C&#8217;s fans feel a great deal of affection for Perk, and anecdotes like this one (from Doc Rivers regarding Paul Pierce&#8217;s explosion last night) explain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He turns the ball over a lot. He can&#8217;t really shoot foul shots. He&#8217;s grouchy, ranks 3rd in the league in technicals and slumped through much of January and February.</p>
<p>But C&#8217;s fans feel a great deal of affection for Perk, and anecdotes like this one (from Doc Rivers regarding Paul Pierce&#8217;s explosion last night) explain a lot of that affection (via <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/nba/columns/story?columnist=forsberg_chris&amp;id=5004936" target="_blank">ESPNBoston.com</a>).</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;</strong><strong><em>There was a play right before they came out [of the game] where we should&#8217;ve thrown it to [</em></strong><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?playerId=2018"><strong><em>Kendrick Perkins</em></strong></a><strong><em>], and Perk said, &#8216;No, I told Paul to just keep being aggressive, we&#8217;ve got to get him back aggressive.&#8217; So it&#8217;s great when everybody recognizes that.&#8221;</em></strong></p>
<p>Team first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/18/the-popularity-of-the-beast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nothing to See Here: C&#8217;s 109, Knicks 97</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/17/nothing-to-see-here-cs-109-knicks-97/</link>
		<comments>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/17/nothing-to-see-here-cs-109-knicks-97/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Lowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Game Recaps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=6818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ESPN Recap • Knickerblogger • P&#38;T • The Knicks Blog
Pace: 95 possessions (above average)
Offensive Efficiency: 114.7 points/100 possessions (league best)
Defensive Efficiency: 102.1 points allowed/100 possessions (league best)
Thumbnail: This was a real basketball game for about 27 minutes. After that, it evolved into a nightmare amalgam of every bad Knick game from the last two seasons&#8212;bundles [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=300317002" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://celticshub.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Picture-33.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-6824" title="Picture 33" src="http://celticshub.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Picture-33-280x300.png" alt="" width="280" height="300" /></a><a href="http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=300317002" target="_blank">ESPN Recap</a> • <a href="http://www.knickerblogger.net" target="_blank">Knickerblogger</a> • <a href="http://www.postingandtoasting.com" target="_blank">P&amp;T</a> • <a href="http://www.theknicksblog.com" target="_blank">The Knicks Blog</a></p>
<p><strong>Pace</strong>: 95 possessions (above average)</p>
<p><strong>Offensive Efficiency</strong>: 114.7 points/100 possessions (league best)</p>
<p><strong>Defensive Efficiency</strong>: 102.1 points allowed/100 possessions (league best)</p>
<p><strong>Thumbnail</strong>: This was a real basketball game for about 27 minutes. After that, it evolved into a nightmare amalgam of every bad Knick game from the last two seasons&#8212;bundles of turnovers, threes jacked with little thought and guys moving around on defense and yet guarding no one. The Celtics scored 68 points in the first half to basically put the game away. Only 8 of those points came on two-point jump shots from outside the paint. Kevin Garnett looked as if he were playing against midgets and Paul Pierce scored 29 in (approximately) five minutes of playing time.</p>
<p><strong>Recap</strong>: On Monday, the Lakers turned the ball over 24 times and generally looked awful in squeaking past a Warriors team stacked with D-Leaguers. Kobe Bryant said afterward (I&#8217;m paraphrasing) that the Warriors played a style so out of line with the rest of the league&#8212;and are so bereft of real NBA talent&#8212;that there was really nothing the Lakers could take from the game going forward. The game didn&#8217;t matter. </p>
<p>In related news, the Knicks put out this line-up early in the 2nd quarter: Bill Walker, J.R. Giddens, Sergio Rodriguez, Chris Duhon, Al Harrington. <span id="more-6818"></span></p>
<p>To recap: We&#8217;ve got two point guards who can&#8217;t shoot, two wing players that couldn&#8217;t get off Boston&#8217;s bench and Al Harrington playing center. Mike Breen and Clyde Frazier burst out laughing when they realized this line-up was on the floor. I am not making that up. They laughed. </p>
<p>With Wilson Chandler out, the Knicks started Bill Walker at power forward and had him take the Jared Jeffries/Kobe role on defense guarding Rajon Rondo. As Jeffries did before him, Walker hung out at the foul line and gave Rondo plenty of space. It&#8217;s a nice idea and it&#8217;s worked before. But it&#8217;s not going to work when all the C&#8217;s have to do to counter it is give the ball to the tall guys in green, because they are three inches taller and much stronger than the tall guys with &#8220;New York&#8221; across their chests. That&#8217;s really it. </p>
<p>Kevin Garnett, Kendrick Perkins and Rasheed Wallace combined for 32 points on 13-of-16 shooting in the first half. All but two of those shots&#8212;both KG jumpers&#8212;came from 12 feet and in, <a href="http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/playbyplay?gameId=300317002&amp;period=0" target="_blank">according to the play-by-play</a>. Of the C&#8217;s 68 first-half points, 34 came in the paint, 15 came on threes and 11 on free throws. That&#8217;s 60 points in a half without a two-point hoop from outside the paint. Tough to lose games that way. </p>
<p><strong>Bullets:</strong></p>
<p>• J.R. Giddens made his first shot of the game, a tough floater from the left baseline (9:03, 2nd Q) with Paul Pierce draped all over him. Giddens woofed at Pierce all the way down the court, and this was aggressive trash talk, not the smiley &#8220;hey, remember we did that in practice, man?&#8221; trash talk. </p>
<p>Giddens made his second shot at the 7:23 mark of the 2nd quarter&#8212;a 22-foot jumper. </p>
<p>In about 9:00 of playing time over the rest of the game, J.R. Giddens scored zero points and pulled down one rebound. </p>
<p>Paul Pierce scored 29 points on 17 shots in 24 minutes of playing time. Paul Pierce will definitely be in the NBA next year.</p>
<p>• Bill Walker didn&#8217;t exactly light the world on fire in 24 minutes of play. To hear some Boston fans talk about the Nate Robinson trade, it&#8217;s as if the C&#8217;s gave up an absolute sure thing to rent Nate Robinson. Let&#8217;s take it easy. Walker has scored 20 points four times in 12 games with the Knicks, but did you see this game tonight? This is what every other Knick game looks like. Anyone can score 20 points a few times in disjointed train wrecks like these. Do you think the Knicks actually care if Bill Walker is on their team next season?</p>
<p>Walker&#8217;s a nice player, and there is definitely a place for him in the league. He&#8217;s a level above Giddens. He&#8217;s a dynamite athlete, his jumper has potential and Mike D&#8217;Antoni said tonight that he is surprised at Walker&#8217;s solid &#8220;feel for the game.&#8221;</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s be reasonable. In any case, a quiet 8-point, 1-rebound night for Walker, who barely had time to say hi to Paul Pierce before he picked up three fouls. </p>
<p>• The play that epitomized this game for me came with about 35 seconds left in the 2nd quarter. Rondo brings the ball up in delayed transition, and KG sets a screen to Rajon&#8217;s right just inside the top of the three-point arc. The screen nails Rondo&#8217;s guy (Toney Douglas, looking decent), so KG&#8217;s man (Lee) switches onto Rondo and Douglas sticks with KG. </p>
<p>Rondo turns the corner on Lee and throws what appears to be almost a blind lob in the direction of the rim. I&#8217;m not even sure if Rajon knew Al Harrington was diving down on the left wing to help Douglas on KG in the paint. Rondo just figured, &#8220;Hey, the Knicks have no tall guys, so I&#8217;ll just throw the ball up in the air and KG will probably catch it and lay it in.&#8221; KG caught it and laid it in. </p>
<p>• When you play the Knicks, you know some guys are going to beat you off the dribble. They play small, they run a decent screen/roll with Lee and they spread the floor with shooters. You&#8217;re going to be doing a lot of aggressive closing out, and the shooters (especially Gallinari and Harrington) are going to see those close-outs and put the ball on the floor. What happens next is the key. </p>
<p>And I thought the Celtics did that next thing very well tonight. In the first half, KG rushed out to crowd Gallo at the three-point line, and when Gallo drove, KG stayed on Gallo&#8217;s hip and shaded him toward the baseline. Gallo could drive to the hoop (and into more help) or launch a floater while leaning away from the hoop. He was 0-of-4 in the first half. </p>
<p>When help duty fell to Perk, he managed to contest shots without fouling by giving the driver a path to one side of the hoop and staying between that player and the basket. Sure, Al Harrington got slight inside position a few times, but Perk&#8217;s long reach forced Al to aim his shots a few inches higher than normal. Harrington did some damage from deep but not from in the lane. </p>
<p>Good stuff, at least when the game was in the balance. I think David Lee dunked the ball about 10 times in the 4th quarter.</p>
<p>• If you want to see what I mean about Rondo trying for the spectacular when the easy play will do, watch the back-to-back Boston possessions starting at the 4:40 mark of the 2nd quarter. On the first, Rondo and KG find themselves on a 2-on-2 fast break with McGrady (on KG) and Harrington (back-pedaling near Rondo). The two Celtics are maybe three feet apart and almost exactly parallel (i.e. not in good position to do anything) when Rondo tries a lefty behind the back pass to a well-guarded KG at the foul line.</p>
<p>KG fumbles the ball, recovers it on the left block and tries to thread a soft pass to Rondo, who is about two feet away under the hoop. The Knicks knock it way. Paul Pierce and Ray Allen are standing on either side of the three-point arc, wide open.</p>
<p>On the next possession (another fast break), Rondo tries to a lob to Ray Allen for a contested alley-oop. It fails. The simple play: Hitting the trailer (Paul Pierce) for a pull-up three. </p>
<p>Two totally unnecessary turnovers. In Rajon&#8217;s defense, the game was beginning to devolve by this point into a run-and-gun highlight reel of transition ball and pull-up threes. But the fact remains: Rajon should take the simple play more often than he does.</p>
<p>• With about 8:00 to go in the 2nd quarter, T-Mac got the ball behind the top of the arc with KG guarding him one-on-one. This would have been amazing in 2003.</p>
<p>• As a fan of a Knicks opponent, no shot makes me happier than a McGrady three. Does Tracy know he&#8217;s a 34 percent career three-point shooter?</p>
<p>• Actually, there is something that makes me happier: When Mike Breen prefaces a Knick shot by saying,  &#8221;And here&#8217;s an open look for Duhon!&#8221;</p>
<p>• Rasheed Wallace&#8217;s first four shots were either lay-ups or short jumpers from the post. He made three of them. His next two were long jump shots, including a three-pointer. They were air balls.</p>
<p>• One thing that bugs me about (some) Knick fans and David Lee: They&#8217;ll call him a center when it&#8217;s convenient for them but otherwise remind you he&#8217;s playing out of position at center. When you point out to this sort of Knick fan that David Lee&#8217;s defense ain&#8217;t exactly the bees knees, they&#8217;ll say, &#8220;Yeah, we&#8217;ll, he&#8217;s a power forward forced to guard centers! What&#8217;s he supposed to do?&#8221; </p>
<p>And then tonight, we got a long narrative from Mike Breen (a good announcer!) listing David Lee&#8217;s very high rankings among centers in various categories. He&#8217;s leads all centers in points and assists per game and he&#8217;s 2nd to Dwight Howard in rebounds per game! Wow!</p>
<p>But where would he rank in those categories among power forwards? </p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for me. I&#8217;ve already given this game more attention than it deserves. A nice win, sure, but now the games get tough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/17/nothing-to-see-here-cs-109-knicks-97/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game 67/82: Knicks (24-43) @ C&#8217;s (42-24)</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/17/game-6782-knicks-24-43-cs-42-24/</link>
		<comments>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/17/game-6782-knicks-24-43-cs-42-24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Robb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Previews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=6814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York at Boston
7:30 P.M. EST.
TD Garden
Local TV/Radio: CSN/WEEI
Offensive Efficiency:
Boston: 107.2 points/100 possessions (15th)
Knicks: 106.9 points/100 possessions (18th)
Defensive Efficiency:
Boston: 102.3 points allowed/100 possessions (1st)
Knicks: 109.9 points allowed/100 possessions (23rd)
Probable NYK starters:
Danilo Gallinari, Al Harrington/Bill Walker, David Lee, Toney Douglas, Tracy McGrady
Injury Report
Knicks: OUT: Eddie House (achilles) Wilson Chandler (knee)

Thumbnail: The Knicks return to town once [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://celticshub.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/pierce.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-5214" title="pierce" src="http://celticshub.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/pierce-300x180.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="180" /></a>New York at Boston<br />
7:30 P.M. EST.<br />
TD Garden<br />
Local TV/Radio: CSN/WEEI</strong></p>
<p><strong>Offensive Efficiency</strong>:</p>
<p><strong>Boston</strong>: 107.2 points/100 possessions (<strong>15th</strong>)</p>
<p><strong>Knicks</strong>: 106.9 points/100 possessions (<strong>18th</strong>)</p>
<p><strong>Defensive Efficiency</strong>:</p>
<p><strong>Boston</strong>: 102.3 points allowed/100 possessions (<strong>1st</strong>)</p>
<p><strong>Knicks</strong>: 109.9 points allowed/100 possessions (<strong>23rd</strong>)</p>
<p><strong>Probable NYK starters</strong>:</p>
<p>Danilo Gallinari, Al Harrington/Bill Walker, David Lee, Toney Douglas, Tracy McGrady</p>
<p><strong>Injury Report</strong></p>
<p><strong>Knicks:</strong> <strong>OUT: Eddie House (achilles) Wilson Chandler (knee)<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Thumbnail</strong>: The Knicks return to town once again to finish off a 6-game road swing, riding some momentum after crushing Dallas over the weekend and beating Philly Monday night. They will be shorthanded off the bench with no Chandler and House, which means plenty of run for old friend Bill Walker as well a Chris Duhon sighting in all probability. Meanwhile, the C&#8217;s look for their 3rd straight home blowout on St. Patty&#8217;s day over an inferior squad, in an attempt to sustain some momentum before an upcoming stretch of 4 games against tough Western foes. <span id="more-6814"></span></p>
<p><strong>WHAT THE KNICKS DO WELL:</strong></p>
<p>This is a tough category to define for the New Yorkers given how much change in personnel they’ve had over the few weeks. The fact is though that they have played well in the last couple weeks (4-6) including a couple of wins over semi-contenders (Atlanta, Dallas) so they can play with the big boys if they get hot.</p>
<p><strong>* Defend The 3 Ball</strong></p>
<p>For a poor defensive team, this is the one thing they do quite well on that end on the floor, limiting their opponents to just 33.8 percent shooting from downtown this year, good for 5<sup>th</sup> in the league. Why this is I’m not too sure, but their strong perimeter defense definitely does not translate well to the interior.<img title="More..." src="http://celticshub.com/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>*Take Care of the Ball</strong></p>
<p>9<sup>th</sup> in the league in turnover percentage…..not exactly world beaters, but a heck of a lot better than your Boston Celtics. New personnel though in the form of Spanish Chocolate and Tracy McGrady could change this.</p>
<p><strong>WHAT THE KNICKS DO POORLY</strong>:</p>
<p>Lots to pick from here, so let’s just make a nice laundry list of items to choose from:</p>
<p><strong>Shooting<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Doesn’t matter from where it is on the floor (45%) or from deep (33%), they don’t do it well</p>
<p><strong>*Rebounding</strong></p>
<p>Rank in the bottom 5 in both offensive and defensive rebounding percentage. That will happen when your 2<sup>nd</sup> best rebounder is Al Harrington at 5.6/game. David Lee is terrific, but gets no help down low <strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Defending the interior</strong></p>
<p>As noted above, when your 2nd best big man rebounder is Al Harrington, it likely indicates a bit of a problem in the paint defending big men. David Lee is no world-beater inside either on the defensive side of things.</p>
<p><strong>PLAYER/S WHO MAKE ME WORRY</strong>:</p>
<p><strong>* David Lee </strong></p>
<p>His offensive rebounding and efficient movement without the ball have always given the C’s some trouble. As long as the C’s keep him to just 20-10, they will be fine, but Perk and company need to pay extra close attention to him on the boards tonight, given their rebounding problems this year.<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>PLAYER/S WHO DO NOT MAKE ME WORRY:</strong></p>
<p><strong>* Tracy McGrady</strong></p>
<p>If the C&#8217;s can&#8217;t contain him, this team has no hope come playoff time.</p>
<p><strong>WHAT WE WANT TO SEE FROM THE C&#8217;s TONIGHT:</strong></p>
<p><strong>* Pound The Interior</strong></p>
<p>As I said before, the Knicks front line right now is extremely thin. In fact their depth chart at center consists of David Lee, Jonathan Bender (yes, the former Pacer) and Al Harrington. KG seems to have gotten his groove back offensively these last couple games as has Perk. Strong interior play will open up the outside game as well as potentially put the Knicks biggest threat against the C’s (David Lee) in foul trouble.</p>
<p><strong>* Focus</strong></p>
<p>Pretty self explanatory.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>PREDICTION</strong>:<strong> </strong>This one stays tight early on, but the Celtics pull away easily in the 2<sup>nd</sup> half.  <strong>Celtics 109, Knicks 91</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/17/game-6782-knicks-24-43-cs-42-24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rondo: &#8220;I Don&#8217;t Think Anybody Can Beat Us&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/17/rondo-i-dont-think-anybody-can-beat-us/</link>
		<comments>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/17/rondo-i-dont-think-anybody-can-beat-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zach Lowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celticshub.com/?p=6809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rajon Rondo is either appropriately confident or the guy standing outside his burning house telling anyone who will listen that the house isn&#8217;t actually on fire. Because he had this exchange with HoopsTV (hat tip: Kevin Arnovitz at TrueHoop):
HTV: The East is very tough this year with talented teams like the Cavs and Magic front [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rajon Rondo is either appropriately confident or the guy standing outside his burning house telling anyone who will listen that the house isn&#8217;t actually on fire. Because he had <a href="http://www.hoopstvonline.com/news/rajonrondointerview.html" target="_blank">this exchange with HoopsTV</a> (hat tip: <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/14350/wednesday-bullets-153" target="_blank">Kevin Arnovitz at TrueHoop</a>):</p>
<p><span style="color: #cc6600;"><strong><em>HTV:</em></strong></span><strong><em> The East is very tough this year with talented teams like the Cavs and Magic front runners for a trip to the Finals. The Celtics have kind of been left out of conversation regarding who may make the NBA Finals this year. What are your thoughts on that subject?</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>RONDO: Nothing. (It means) we beat ourselves if we don&#8217;t win it. I don&#8217;t think anybody can beat us. Atlanta swept us already, Cleveland is up two to one (now 3 to 1), Orlando is up two to one, but at the end of the day I think that we can beat any of those teams (in a playoff series).</em></strong></p>
<p>The best part about this is how Rondo lists&#8212;accurately!&#8212;Boston&#8217;s horrid record against the East&#8217;s other three elite teams and then says, basically, Who cares?</p>
<p>What would Rajon say if he were on the Nets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://celticshub.com/2010/03/17/rondo-i-dont-think-anybody-can-beat-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.571 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-19 04:55:47 -->
